顶空-固相微萃取法与水蒸气蒸馏法提取沙棘挥发油组分的比较研究

张鹏云; 李蓉; 卢俊文; 张朋杰; 陈丽斯; 张峰

doi:doi：10.3969/j.issn.1004-4957.2019.06.011

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

顶空-固相微萃取法与水蒸气蒸馏法提取沙棘挥发油组分的比较研究

- 顶空-固相微萃取法与水蒸气蒸馏法提取沙棘挥发油组分的比较研究
- Comparison of Volatile Components in Hippophae Rhamnoides L.Extracted by Headspace Solid Phase Microextraction and Steam Distillation
- 分析测试学报 2019年38卷第6期页码：699-705
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中山出入境检验检疫局检验检疫技术中心
  2. 广东药科大学公共卫生学院
  3. 中国检验检疫科学研究院食品安全研究所
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFF0211000)
- DOI：doi：10.3969/j.issn.1004-4957.2019.06.011
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2019
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
张鹏云, 李蓉, 卢俊文, 张朋杰, 陈丽斯, 张峰. 顶空-固相微萃取法与水蒸气蒸馏法提取沙棘挥发油组分的比较研究[J]. 分析测试学报, 2019,38(6):699-705.

张鹏云, 李蓉, 卢俊文, 张朋杰, 陈丽斯, 张峰. Comparison of Volatile Components in Hippophae Rhamnoides L.Extracted by Headspace Solid Phase Microextraction and Steam Distillation[J]. 2019, 38(6): 699-705.
张鹏云, 李蓉, 卢俊文, 张朋杰, 陈丽斯, 张峰. 顶空-固相微萃取法与水蒸气蒸馏法提取沙棘挥发油组分的比较研究[J]. 分析测试学报, 2019,38(6):699-705. DOI： doi：10.3969/j.issn.1004-4957.2019.06.011.

张鹏云, 李蓉, 卢俊文, 张朋杰, 陈丽斯, 张峰. Comparison of Volatile Components in Hippophae Rhamnoides L.Extracted by Headspace Solid Phase Microextraction and Steam Distillation[J]. 2019, 38(6): 699-705. DOI： doi：10.3969/j.issn.1004-4957.2019.06.011.

摘要

优化了顶空-固相微萃取法(HS-SPME)提取沙棘挥发性成分的条件，并采用气相色谱-质谱联用技术(GC-MS)分别对HS-SPME法和水蒸气蒸馏法(SD)的提取物进行分析。结果显示，在萃取温度为70 ℃，萃取时间为50 min，解吸时间为7 min，平衡时间为20 min条件下，HS-SPME法鉴定出76种组分，占挥发性物质总量的90.19%，主要成分为酯类、醛类和酮类；而SD法提取物共鉴定出56种组分，占挥发性物质总量的91.98%，主要成分为酯类。2种方法共有组分为20种。两种方法提取的沙棘挥发油组分的种类及含量差异较大，HS-SPME法更适合沙棘挥发性组分的快速检测。

Abstract

The conditions for extracting volatile components in Hippophae rhamnoides L.by headspace solidphase microextraction(HS-SPME) were optimized.Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry(GC-MS) was used to detect the extracts by HS-SPME and steam distillation(SD).Results showed that the optimum conditions for HS-SPME were as follows:the extraction temperature and the extraction time were 70 ℃ and 50 min

respectively

and the desorption time and the equilibrium time were 7 min and 20 min

respectively.Under this condition

76 components were identified from the HS-SPME extracts

accounting for 90.19% of the total

and the main components were esters

aldehydes and ketones

respectively

while 56 components were identified from the SD extracts

accounting for 91.98% of the total

and the main components were esters.20 common components were detected in both the extracts.There are great differences in the types and contents of volatile oil in Hippophae rhamnoides L.extracted by the two extraction methods.The HS-SPME is more suitable for the rapid detection of volatile components in Hippophae rhamnoides L.

关键词

Keywords

references

浏览量

261

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于顶空气相色谱-离子迁移谱的掌叶覆盆子不同部位挥发性成分分析

基于气相色谱-离子迁移谱及机器学习的不同产地香附饮片的快速鉴别

基于HS-GC-IMS技术解析不同干燥工艺对西红花挥发性成分的影响

基于深度学习目标检测-显微拉曼光谱法的微塑料自动检测

环境中微/纳塑料的定义辨析及检测的可靠性分析