The Strategy of Multi-wavelength Automatic Fusion Fingerprint and Its Application in Propolis Quality Evaluation

JIANG Hui-jie; ZHANG Yue; SHEN Kai-fen; JIANG Yan; ZHOU Dan-ying; ZHAO Hong-jing

doi:10.19969/j.fxcsxb.23080304

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

The Strategy of Multi-wavelength Automatic Fusion Fingerprint and Its Application in Propolis Quality Evaluation

Scientific Papers | 更新时间：2023-12-25

- The Strategy of Multi-wavelength Automatic Fusion Fingerprint and Its Application in Propolis Quality Evaluation
- Journal of Instrumental Analysis Vol. 42, Issue 12, Pages: 1588-1597(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  1.浙江省中药研究所有限公司，浙江杭州 310023
  2.国家市场监督管理总局食品审评中心，北京 100070
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.19969/j.fxcsxb.23080304
  CLC：
扫描看全文
姜慧洁,章越,慎凯峰等.多波长自动融合指纹图谱策略及其在蜂胶质量评价中的应用[J].分析测试学报,2023,42(12):1588-1597.

JIANG Hui-jie,ZHANG Yue,SHEN Kai-fen,et al.The Strategy of Multi-wavelength Automatic Fusion Fingerprint and Its Application in Propolis Quality Evaluation[J].Journal of Instrumental Analysis,2023,42(12):1588-1597.
姜慧洁,章越,慎凯峰等.多波长自动融合指纹图谱策略及其在蜂胶质量评价中的应用[J].分析测试学报,2023,42(12):1588-1597. DOI： 10.19969/j.fxcsxb.23080304.

JIANG Hui-jie,ZHANG Yue,SHEN Kai-fen,et al.The Strategy of Multi-wavelength Automatic Fusion Fingerprint and Its Application in Propolis Quality Evaluation[J].Journal of Instrumental Analysis,2023,42(12):1588-1597. DOI： 10.19969/j.fxcsxb.23080304.

摘要

提出了一种简化数据处理过程的多波长自动融合指纹图谱策略，并应用于蜂胶乙醇提取物的质量评价。运用超高效液相色谱（UPLC）技术对5个厂家的15批蜂胶乙醇提取物进行220、245、270、320 nm的多波长检测。样品采用Agilent Poroshell 120 EC-C,18,（3 mm×100 mm，2.7 μm）色谱柱进行分离；以甲醇-0.2%磷酸水溶液为流动相进行梯度洗脱。利用“中药色谱指纹图谱相似度评价系统”进行全峰匹配，实现了每个样品多个波长下各色谱峰数据的自动融合。以270 nm单波长为对照，比较其与多波长融合在共有色谱峰、相似度评价、聚类分析、主成分分析方面的差异。蜂胶多波长融合指纹图谱包含33个特征峰，其中14个特征峰可定性，分别为咖啡酸、,ρ,-香豆酸、阿魏酸、异阿魏酸、3，4-二甲氧基肉桂酸、肉桂酸、槲皮素、山奈素、芹菜素、异鼠李素、乔松素、白杨素、高良姜素、咖啡酸苯乙酯。各批次特征峰保留时间的相对标准偏差（RSD）均小于1.00%，峰面积RSD为14.39%~112.02%，平均值为37.94%。15批蜂胶融合指纹图谱的相似度为0.902~0.994，主成分分析、聚类分析均可将样品分为4类。蜂胶270 nm单波长的指纹图谱包含32个特征峰，12个特征峰可定性。15批蜂胶单波长指纹图谱的相似度为0.928~0.997，主成分分析、聚类分析均可将样品分为3类。相比于270 nm单波长，多波长融合的相似度评价更敏感，主成分分析和聚类分析更准确。该多波长自动融合指纹图谱策略可对多波长数据进行快速、自动处理，丰富不同组分在各波长下的色谱信息，提高蜂胶指纹图谱差异评价的准确性。

Abstract

A multi-wavelength automatic fusion fingerprint strategy was proposed to simplify the data processing process and applied to the quality evaluation of propolis ethanol extracts. 15 batches of propolis ethanol extracts from 5 manufacturers were tested at multiple wavelengths of 220，245，270，320 nm through UPLC technology. The sample was separated on an Agilent Poroshell 120 EC-C,18,（3 mm×100 mm，2.7 μm） column by gradient elution，with methanol and 0.2% phosphoric acid aqueous solution as mobile phases．The multi-wavelength fusion fingerprint for each batch was generated by using the“Similarity Evaluation System for Traditional Chinese Medicine Chromatographic Fingerprint”to achieve automatic fusion of various chromatographic peaks under multiple wavelengths. The differences between multi-wavelength fusion and 270 nm single wavelength were compared in common chromatographic peaks，similarity evaluation，cluster analysis，and principal component analysis. The multi-wavelength fusion fingerprint of propolis contained 33 characteristic peaks，in which 14 characteristic peaks have been identified to be caffeic acid，,ρ,-coumaric acid，ferulic acid，isoferulic acid，3，4-dimethoxy group cinnamic acid，quercetin，kaempferin，apigenin，isorhamnetin，chocine，chrysin，galangin，caffeic acid，phenethyl ester. The retention time RSDs of characteristic peaks in each batch were less than 1.00% and the peak area RSDs were ranged from 14.39% to 112.02%，with an average value of 37.94%. The similarity of 15 batches of propolis fusion fingerprints ranged from 0.902 to 0.994. The samples could be divided into four categories through the principal component analysis and the clustering analysis. The 270 nm single wavelength fingerprint of propolis contained 32 characteristic peaks，of which 12 have been identified. The similarity of 270 nm single wavelength fingerprint of 15 batches of propolis ranged from 0.928 to 0.997. The samples were divided into three categories by the principal component analysis and cluster analysis. Compared to the single wavelength of 270 nm，the multi-wavelength fusion similarity evaluation was more sensitive，and its principal component analysis and cluster analysis were more accurate. The strategy of multi-wavelength automatic fusion fingerprint could process multi-wavelength data quickly and automatically，enrich the chromatographic information of different components at different wavelengths，and improve the accuracy of differential evaluation of propolis fingerprint.

关键词

多波长自动融合指纹图谱蜂胶质量评价化学模式识别

Keywords

multi-wavelengthautomatic fusionfingerprintpropolisquality evaluationchemical pattern recognition

references

State Pharmacopoeia Committee. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China. Beijing：China Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Press（国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典. 北京：中国医药科技出版社），2020：373-374.

GB/T 24283-2018. Propolis. National Standards of the People’s Republic of China（蜂胶. 中华人民共和国国家标准）.

Huang S，Zhang C P，Hu F L. Nat. Prod. Res. Dev.（黄帅，张翠平，胡福良. 天然产物研究与开发），2013，25（8）：1146-1153，1165.

Ge Y Q，Wang Q，Tong T. J. Food Saf. Qual. （葛怡青，汪浅，仝涛. 食品安全质量检测学报），2022，13（4）：1027-1035.

Wu Y，Wu L F，Xu Y，Wang D. Chin. Med. Mater.（吴毅，吴良发，许妍，王栋. 中药材），2013，36（2）：314-316.

Luo Z M，Dong J，Zhao L L，Zhang H C. Food Sci.（罗照明，董捷，赵亮亮，张红城. 食品科学），2013，34（10）：139-143.

Sun S W，He J，Liu M J，Li J ，Yin G L. J. Food Saf. Qual.（孙圣伟，何健，刘美娟，李俊，殷光玲. 食品安全质量检测学报），2019，10（16）：5532-5537.

Sun S W，He J，Liu M J，Li K P，Zhang X G，Yin G L. J. Food Saf. Qual.（孙圣伟，何健，刘美娟，李坤平，张旭光，殷光玲. 食品安全质量检测学报），2020，11（1）：269-274.

Jia A L，Zhu K，Zheng A Z，Qiu Z D. Chin. J. Exp. Tradit. Med. Form.（贾艾玲，朱凯，郑爱竹，邱智东. 中国实验方剂学杂志），2016，22（3）：48-52.

Sun G X，Hou Z F，Li W Y，Yu Y P，Ma D D，Chen B. Cent. South Pharm.（孙国祥，侯志飞，李文颖，于云鹏，马迪迪，陈斌. 中南药学），2014，12（6）：497-504.

Wang S，Bao Y R，Li T J，Yang X X，Meng X S. J. Instrum. Anal.（王帅，包永睿，李天娇，杨欣欣，孟宪生. 分析测试学报），2021，40（1）：132-138.

Wu X F，Zhou X，Wang X L，Wu H Q，Xie B. J. Instrum. Anal.（吴学峰，周熙，黄晓兰，吴惠勤，谢斌. 分析测试学报），2022，41（3）：299-308.

Zhang D W，Ma K，Tian P，Guo X Y. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs（张迪文，马开，田萍，郭晓燕. 中草药），2019，50（14）：3426-3432.

Wang L H，Qian Y Y，Wei M，Song P P，Yang Y，Wang X W. Chin. J. Pharm. Anal.（王力弘，钱怡云，韦敏，宋萍萍，杨迎，王鑫伟. 药物分析杂志），2023，43（4）：558-563.

Yu Y T，Liu J，Bai C，Zhao S J，Yang J，Wu H，Pan Q X，Liu T G，Xiao H B. J. Instrum. Anal.（郁映婷，刘洁，白辰，赵淑军，杨洁，吴浩，潘绮雪，刘铁钢，肖红斌. 分析测试学报），2021，40（1）：99-105.

Wang L J，Yang L，Zhang Z J，Yu J，Yang J Z，Sun G X，Zhou C H. China Pharm.（王玲娇，杨亮，张振杰，于静，杨继章，孙国祥，周春华. 中国药业），2019，28（18）：29-31.

Sun G X，Wu B，Bi K S. Chin. J. Chromatogr.（孙国祥，吴波，毕开顺. 色谱），2010，28（9）：877-884.

Xu P C，Zhu F J，Zheng C W，Han P，Wang N N. Chin. J. Mod. Appl. Pharm.（许平翠，朱赋健，郑纯威，韩鹏，王娜妮. 中国现代应用药学），2022，39（22）：2901-2907.

Yu Y，Wang S，Li T J，Zhao L，Bao Y L，Zhang X J，Meng X S. Cent. South Pharm.（于洋，王帅，李天娇，赵琳，包永睿，张秀君，孟宪生. 中南药学），2023，21（3）：771-776.

Zhang H，Bai R，Wu Y M，Zeng J L，Jiang H J，Liu X Y，Zhang H X，Yan J Z. Anal. Methods-UK，2022，14（21）：2051-2062.

Yang L P，Xie X M，Yang L，Zhang J，Sun G X. RSC Adv.，2016，6（90）：87616-87627.

Yan B ，Yang L P，Ma D D，Sun G X. J. Chromatogr. Sci.，2017，55（10）：1026-1036.

Ma D D，Gong D D，Sun G X，Yang F L. Chin. J. Chromatogr.（马迪迪，巩丹丹，孙国祥，杨方良. 色谱），2017，35（7）：741-747.

GH/T 1087-2013. Method for Identification of Authenticity of Propolis-High performance Liquid Chromatographic Fingerprint Method. Industry Standards of Supply and Marketing Cooperatives of the People’s Republic of China（蜂胶真实性鉴别方法高效液相色谱指纹图谱法. 中华全国供销合作总社）.

GH/T 1312-2020. The Determination of Chlorogenic Acid，Caffeic Acid，ρ-Coumaric Acid，3，5-Dicaffeoylquinic Acid，4，5-Dicaffeoylquinic Acid and Artepillin C in Propolis-High Performance Liquid Chromatography. Industry Standards of Supply and Marketing Cooperatives of the People’s Republic of China（蜂胶中绿原酸、咖啡酸、ρ-香豆酸、3，5-二咖啡酰奎宁酸、4，5-二咖啡酰奎宁酸和阿替匹林C的测定高效液相色谱法. 中华全国供销合作总社）.

GH/T 1280-2019. Determination of Cafferic Acid，Acidρ-Coumaric，AcidFerulic，Pinobanksin，Pinocembrin，3-O-acetylpinobanksin，Chrysin and Galangin in Propolis-Reversed-phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography Method. Industy Standards of Supply and Marketing Cooperatives of the People’s Republic of China（蜂胶中咖啡酸、ρ-香豆酸、阿魏酸、短叶松素、松属素、短叶松素3-乙酸酯、白杨素和高良姜素含量的测定反相高效液相色谱法. 中华全国供销合作总社）.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Multi-index Quantitative Fingerprint Analysis of Purine （Nucleoside） Components in Bombyx Batryticatus Based on UPLC－UV－Q－TOF MS

Analysis of Chemical Constituents in Fuke Zaizao Pill by Ultra Fast Liquid Chromatography－Ion Trap Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry

Quality Difference Analysis of Salviae Miltiorrhizae Radix et Rhizoma from Different Origins Based on Multi-index Content Determination Combined with Chemometrics

Study on the Material Basis and Quality Standard Improvement of Zhuangyao Jianshen Tablets

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

Zhejiang Traditional Chinese Medicine Research Institute Co.，Ltd.

National Engineering Research Center for Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Sichuan Medicine Research Sub-center，Pengzhou

Sichuan Engineering Research Center of Antiviral Traditional Chinese Medicine Industrialization，Pengzhou

Sichuan Guangda Pharmaceutical Co.，Ltd.，Pengzhou

School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering，East China University of Science and Technology

Address：100 Xianlie Middle Road, Guangzhou Postal code：510070
Tel：020-87684776,37656606 Fax：020-87684776 Email：fxcsxb@china.com
Technical support is provided by Beijing Founder electronics co., LTD 粤ICP备12017312号-3 京公网安备11010802024621
It is recommended to read the content of this site in Chrome&IE9+. Please switch to extreme mode in browser 360.
Cookies We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. By continuing, you agree to the use of cookies.

⁰